Volume 5, Issue 6-1, December 2016, Page: 1-5
Insulation of Ceiling with Different Insulation Materials and its Effect on Energy Saving
Ö. Altan DOMBAYCI, Department of Material Engineering and Science, Faculty of Technology, Pamukkale University, Kinikli, Denizli, Turkey
Harun Kemal ÖZTÜRK, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Engineering Faculty, Pamukkale University, Kinikli, Denizli, Turkey
Received: Jun. 9, 2016;       Accepted: Jun. 21, 2016;       Published: Jul. 9, 2016
DOI: 10.11648/j.ijmsa.s.2016050601.11      View  2821      Downloads  83
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to investigate the effect of ceiling insulation with different insulation material on energy saving. The values of the optimum insulation thickness, the payback periods (PP), and the life-cycle savings (LCS) for three different types of insulation materials (expanded polystyrene, glass wool, and rock wool) were calculated. In calculations, life cycle cost analysis (LCCA) was applied. In the analysis, the present-worth factor (PWF) technique was used for evaluating systems and annual interest and inflation rates were taken 8% and 0%, respectively. The best solution was obtained when the expanded polystyrene was used. The optimum insulation thickness, PP, and LCS were computed as 0.0901m, 1.615years, and 9.643 $/m2, respectively.
Keywords
Insulation Thickness, Life Cycle Cost, Energy Saving, Insulation Materials
To cite this article
Ö. Altan DOMBAYCI, Harun Kemal ÖZTÜRK, Insulation of Ceiling with Different Insulation Materials and its Effect on Energy Saving, International Journal of Materials Science and Applications. Special Issue:Energy and Materials. Vol. 5, No. 6-1, 2016, pp. 1-5. doi: 10.11648/j.ijmsa.s.2016050601.11
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Reference
[1]
M. Spinnler, E. R. F. Winter, R. Viskanta “Studies on high- temperature multilayer thermal insulations”, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 2004, 47: 1305-1312.
[2]
H. T. Ozkahraman, A. Bolatturk, “The use of tuff stone cladding in buildings for energy conservation”, Construction and Buildings Materials 2006, 20: 435-440.
[3]
P. P. Taylor, E. H. Mathews, M. Kleingeld, G.W. Taljaard, “The effect of ceiling insulation on indoor comfort”, Building and Environment 2000, 35: 339-346.
[4]
E. H. Mathews, M. Kleingeld, P.B. Taylor, “Estimating the electricity savings effect of ceiling insulation”, Building and Environment 1999, 34: 505-514.
[5]
A. K. Dagsöz, “Isı yalıtımı ve kalorifer tesisatı standartları üzerine görüşleri. MMO Tesisat Mühendisliği”, 2001.
[6]
WEO, World Energy Outlook 2012, International Energy Agency, 2012.
[7]
A. Bolatturk, “The calculations of optimum insulation thickness and the role of energy saving in buildings. Proceedings 14th The Congress of National Heat Science and Technical”, Isparta, 2003.
[8]
Ö. A Dombaycı, M. Gölcü, Y.Pancar, “Optimization of insulation thickness for externall walls using different energy sources” Applied Energy 2006, 83: 921-928.
[9]
S. Dilmac, N.A. Kesen, “Comparision of new Turkish thermal insulation standart (TS 825), ISO 9164, EN 832 and German regulation” Energy and Buildings 2003, 35: 161-174.
[10]
Turkish Standarts (TS 825) The rule of thermal insulation in buildings Formal Newspaper 23725, 1999.
[11]
A. K. Dagsöz, The Degree Days in Turkey, İzocam A-61995.
[12]
Y. A. Cengel, “Heat Transfer a Practical Approach”, McGraw-Hill, New York, 2001.
Browse journals by subject